Category Archives: Sports
Highlights of Oct. 15, 2024
The logic was this:
Wild/Blues – With Minnesota ahead 3-1 in the third period, St. Louis would inevitably pull the goalie in the final minutes, meaning the Wild had a chance to “win by the correct score of 4-1.” But I was tipped off that St. Louis took a double-minor penalty (4 minutes) with just over 4 minutes left, meaning that 1) Minnesota might not try to score on the PP and 2) the Blues might not pull the goalie. That meant the game might finish at 3-1, with no more goals scored. I jumped in at +1800 odds.
With 1 minute left and the score still 3-1, the cashout value was at 95% of the payout, so I cashed out with 30 seconds left. Good call, as the Blues finally pulled with about 17 seconds left, and the Minnesota goalie shot the puck into the empty net with 8 seconds left. “Correct score 4-1” winner, and cashout of “no next goal” was the right move.

The Oilers game was simple: They were 0-3-0 to start the season, and Philadelphia was a tired team after having played in western Canada already vs. Vancouver and Calgary. Oilers were a potent team 3-on-3 in OT. So, when it was 3-2 for the Flyers late in the game, a “tie” (ie. game to go to OT) was the choice. Then after the Oilers tied it, the pick was for Edmonton to win. When the game went to OT, the pick was for the Oilers to win in OT.



The logic with Seattle vs. Nashville is that once the Kraken went ahead 5-3 early in the third, they might get an empty-net goal later, so the pick was -2.5. But when they went up 6-3 early enough, the pick was -3.5 with the idea that the Preds might pull the goalie down 3 goals. They did, and the Kraken did score at the end to win 7-3.


The other picks ranged from okay to great (TB to win 4-1, etc.), but the NYK pick was awful. The odds were bad. For the Flames game, they were up 2-1 vs. Chicago and the idea was that the Blackhawks were not going to tie the game, and even if Calgary scored into an empty net (it happened with 36 seconds left), there was “a goal to give” for the under 4.5 pick.




From 25 to 452

It was a wild game with this one… I originally took Minnesota to “win by the correct score of 4-1” with the Wild ahead 3-1 in the final few minutes of regulation. The rationale is that the Wild will try to score into the empty net once the Blues inevitably would pull the goalie for an extra skater.
Then I was tipped off that the Blues were given a double minor (4 minutes killing off two penalties) with 4 minutes left. So, that meant the Wild, up 3-1, might play “keep-away” and not try to score, and the Blues will not have a chance to pull the goalie for the empty net.
At that point, I hastily picked “no next goal” as a hedge. With no more goals from that point until the final minute, the cash-out value ballooned to 95 percent of the potential payout value. With 30 seconds left, I cashed out. It turned out to be the right call, as with about 17 seconds left, the Blues pulled their goalie, and the Wild netminder shot the puck into the empty net to make it 4-1. That means the cash-out was a great call.
And that goal also meant the “4-1 correct score” (the original, smaller payout play) also won.

People just like knocking me down
I had a great conversation with Michael Unger (@UDeck1990 on X) about his baseball card postings on social media; it was a wonderful discussion about baseball players from the 1990s.
While that was a great discussion, as I mentioned during the episode, people are vicious if they don’t agree with you.
There’s an example of a situation with a coworker many years ago, when I mentioned that a certain player (who made his major-league debut in that same decade of the 1990s) was overrated. That player happened to be my coworker’s favourite players — or at least one of his favourites. This was an in-person comment that I made when we were discussing baseball.
The coworker began targeting me ever since, for the duration of my time in that organization. First, he sent me a lengthy email stating why I was wrong and why that player was not overrated. Then he just stopped cooperating with me at work. He eventually attempted to get me fired, coming up with a devious scheme.
I left that organization shortly after, but I’m better for it. It was a toxic environment and not just because of that coworker. Management was incompetent, for the most part, and did not appreciate hard work. They appreciated those who kissed asses while not working hard or working smart.
After leaving, I went through a period where I became productive with other projects and also learned who my friends were and who weren’t. I reached out to some “friends” and lamented that I had left my company — and most of them never contacted me again. They cut me off, cut me out, because — apparently — they thought I was a lowlife who didn’t have a job.
But I was productive in other areas, and I’m proud of some of the things I did during that time.
Anyway, that’s just one story. And this one started because I made a comment about a baseball player (who, incidentally, has already passed away) that the coworker liked.
Seriously?
Like I said, people are vicious. They just are.
(Note: The player whom I said was overrated had the same pitching style as another pitcher that I mentioned in the podcast, but I won’t say that deceased player’s name.)
A lot of people have been and are bullies…
I stand by what I posted a week ago on my social media profiles… Yes, I did indeed use the word “bullied.” It’s unfortunate but true.
I think back to the days when I was in school and in university when I didn’t talk much due to different factors, including being bullied or encouraged to not talk or just having a quiet personality, etc. …but ahhh on a day like today years later, I’m talking a lot in class (as an instructor) and as a play-by-play announcer….






